Archive for the ‘Children's Environments’ Category

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part XI: Affordances meets social skill development

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

Physical environments that provide a range of affordances for children also provide opportunities for children to gather together in search of common activities and, possibly, common engagement and friendship.

Awhile back, I installed a small pond at my home to engage my son in the natural environment. I had observed that he enjoyed watching wildlife and I was keen on attracting frogs and other aquatic life into our garden. The pond soon became the place for the annual mating ritual of American toads each spring. Matthew reported on the amount of toads in the pond each day, and later how many tadpoles took residence there as well. Later that spring, we invited other children over for various play dates. Instead of doing indoor things, however, Matthew and the other children were found playing by the pond, dipping their hands into the water to touch the tadpoles. Matthew and the tadpoles became pretty popular with the other kids that spring and summer, but even as the tadpoles grew into toads and left the pond, the children still came over to play with Matthew and spend time by the pond. The children marveled when they dropped water onto the lotus leaves and the droplets turned into silver beads. Tiny, multicolored goldfish darted under the profusion of water lilies and duck potato – inviting the kids to search more intently for them. I was pleasantly surprised to discover that, despite their attention problems, many of the children stayed by the pond for at least an hour, talking, sharing stories, and investigating the depths of the pond.

It’s been over four years since the toads moved in, and Matthew is now a teenager. Yet, when his friends still come over, they get Matthew and the first place they all head for is the pond.

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part X: Affordances in the Physical Environment

Thursday, April 14th, 2011

In my discussions with autistic children (child collaborators), together with their parents, I’ve learned that the more opportunities a place has for people, the greater the chance people will visit it. Duh! (This is a researcher’s term! We say it to ourselves all the time when reading journal articles.) And, yet, with regard to children’s environments, we still design places that are single-type uses. For example, there is a big push for storybook exhibits for children’s museums. While the sculpted settings are fun to look at, you can’t crawl on them. There are also too few opportunities to read the actual books. Even at Philadelphia’s Please Touch Museum, their Alice and Wonderland maze has children crawling all over the walls while signs say, “Do not climb”. Or playgrounds that provide only play equipment but no places to hide or passively watch the world.

Two of the children in my group of child collaborators are brother and sister, both autistics. However, this is where the family similarities stop. The brother has hypo-sensitivities towards noise, glare, lateral movements and heights; the sister is more of a “sensory seeker” who loves to be challenged by sensations. The brother loves everything dinosaur and could spend the day (and overnight) in a dinosaur museum. The sister, who has spent her entire life in dinosaur museums (because of her brother), vastly prefers any place else; she especially enjoys places with live animals. After her divorce, their mother found that it was difficult, if not impossible, to accommodate both children’s needs in typical children’s environments. If only we could have both (environments) in one place!

Here’s where the theory of affordances comes into play! Fifty or so years ago, Dr. James Jerome Gibson wrote about how creatures perceived of their physical environment. Using their senses, each creature does a quick study of the environment to determine its affordances – what the environment can afford, or offer. If I am thirsty, and looking for water, I will look for features that suggest the presence of water: vegetation associated with rivers, streams or ponds, etc.; certain geological features for waterfalls or low-lying areas that suggest lakes or ponds. If I were in the city, I would look for signs that would direct me to a water fountain, soda machine, restaurant or bar.

Perhaps a better example is this: the brother and sister, who I had previously mentioned, walk into a public garden and look around. The sister spies a pond with fish and then spends time watching the fish, touching the water, gazing at the clouds reflected in the water. The brother spots a rock wall (which happens to be supporting a terraced garden) with bits of fossils in them and spends his time identifying the fossils. The walk further into the garden and see a large tree. To one of the children, the tree provides a shady refuge from the glaring sun; to the other child, it is a veritable monkey-bar-like climbing paradise! Other creatures have also gravitated towards the tree as well: a bird makes its nest in the protection of its clustered branches; a beetle crawls into a broken piece of bark, looking for shelter and food; a sapsucker notices the break in the bark as well and pecks away at it in search of a meal (the beetle). The one thing – the tree – affords a multitude of uses for different creatures. The more affordances that a single thing provides make it more popular as a place or activity! Perhaps, by grouping things, that each has their own cluster of affordances, we create a place of diversity that can be enjoyed by a diverse group of individuals. In my interviews with my 15 child collaborators, the majority of their favorite environments had, in addition to the children’s preferred activities, so many more uses as well.

Next: Affordances meets social skill development

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part IX: Play for All

Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

While I have been describing sensory issues and links to the physical environment, there are people out there who have actually been doing things about these issues. Ingrid M. Kanics, OTR/L, an Occupational Therapist and play advocate, has been speaking at conferences about inclusive play. I first learned about her at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) in Washington, DC, last September when she presented “A Higher Level of Inclusion: Trends in Playground Design.” There she showed examples of play equipment that was not only directed towards the main population of children but, finally, towards those children whose sensitivities ranged from hypo (too sensitive) to hyper (not sensitive enough). Kanics pointed out that this latter group, while small in size compared to the entire population of children, had sensitivities that prevented them from playing on typical playgrounds, never mind playing with other children. By providing equipment that supported children of all abilities, Kanics maintained, we support play for children of all abilities.

Interestingly, members of the audience began to ask whether such play equipment could support therapies for older children and adults, especially older people with developmental delays who need different forms of physical exercise from their peers. While playground manufacturers have not been marketing in this area, representatives from Landscape Structures, the company that has been sponsoring research in play structures for disabled people, indicated that they are looking at this issue as well.

Links:

Ingrid M. Kanic’s powerpoint handout (accessed April 13, 2011 from the Internet):

http://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/Meetings_and_Events/2010_Annual_Meeting_Handouts/Fri-B9%20A%20Higher%20Level%20of%20Inclusion%20-%20Trends%20in%20Playground%20Design.pdf

Other Kanic articles:

http://www.devdelay.org/newsletter/articles/html/265-making-sense-of-summer-camp.html

Landscape Structures’ Advisory Committee:

http://www.playlsi.com/Explore-Products/Universally-Accessible-Playgrounds/Inclusive-Play-Advisory-Board/Pages/Inclusive-Play-Advisory-Board.aspx

Blogs that discuss Kanic’s work and sensory issues:

http://www.thebeakerkids.com/inclusion-strategies/

http://www.rollingrains.com/travelogues/2010/10/why-i-have-confidence-in-landscape-structures-inc-and-their-consultant-ingrid-kanics.html

Next: Affordances in the Physical Environment

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part VIII: Crowding

Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

Jared, 4 years of age, wasn’t your typical child, his mother told me. “He was never found playing with blocks, or sitting down, painting or the other quiet stuff he could never get through because he didn’t have his fill of the physical stuff.”

For kids like Jared, growing up in Brooklyn, the place to play was a neighborhood park 20 minutes walking distance from his mother’s NYC apartment. This was also his very favorite place, according to his mother. “Here’s what has always been the rub: It’s his favorite place where he could get his energy out. But it’s also where the noise, and definitely the proximity of kids – a New York City playground on a May afternoon, for a kid with sensory issues – it’s a nightmare!”

Jared loved playing in the sandbox, especially the sensory nature of its texture and feel. He’d roll around in the sand as well as play with it. But, according to his mother, he could not handle the sensory overload of too many kids bumping into him or the noise of their shrieks and giggles. Fortunately for Jared, he was enrolled in a pre-school that provided various forms of therapies: sensory integration, art, music and horticulture. There, he was able to get his fill of physical activity in a quiet setting. His mother was also befriended by other mothers who were looking for less crowded and noisy settings such as the trails in Prospect Park. There, Jared took opportunities to lead the small group of children off the path to explore some of the wooded places, under the careful supervision of the parents.

Jared’s mother indicated that the neighborhood playground was being redesigned. She wished there was a way to change places like the sandbox so that it wouldn’t be so crowded. Teardrop Park, in Battery Park City, broke the tradition of having small, controllable areas for sandboxes. Sand tends to attract animals, especially cats that use the sand as a litter box. At Teardrop Park, however, the sand is placed in a long, linear area that tends to do away with the congestion of small, noisy bodies. This configuration might be just the thing to stop the clash of the tiny titans on public playgrounds!

Next: Finding just the right form of sensory play

April is Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part VII: Sensory Needs

Monday, April 11th, 2011

This past June, my son competed at Junior Nationals for Trampoline in Virginia Beach, VA. On one of our days off, we visited the Virginia Beach Aquarium. Some of their displays near the entrance were of unusual land creatures that spent much of their day in water. They had just installed a room for the Komodo dragon. Possibly, to keep the dragon from feeling too much on display, our area for viewing was cavelike, with festoons of vines hanging from the ceiling and spilling around the edges of the window, shielding us from the dragon’s sight.

I was about to move to the next exhibit space when I heard a voice behind me say, “Afraid. I’m afraid…” I turned around to see a young woman standing in the center of the room. Her head was bent towards the floor and her arms hugged her body as if to try to comfort herself. I went up to her and asked her if she was okay and she repeated “I’m afraid.”

“Is there anyone here with you?” I asked.

“Yes. My grandmother.” Her eyes never lifted their gaze up from the floor.

“Is this place the problem?” The words popped out of my mouth.

She nodded vigorously. “They changed it. It was different before and they changed it.”

“What did they change?” I asked.

“They made it darker. There are vines – It’s scary.”

I explained that the Aquarium probably wanted to make the new lizard feel more at home and put us in the dark so the animal wouldn’t feel on display. She nodded her head.

“Would you like me to walk with you for awhile? Maybe if we leave this room, you’ll feel better?” I asked. Again, she nodded and took my arm. As we left the room, she sighed and seemed to gather her energy in the hallway. We met up with her grandmother down the hall.

“You need to act your age!” the older woman exclaimed when she saw her granddaughter. The young woman said nothing. I tried to explain that I researched places like this to find out how people responded to them and suggested that her granddaughter was uncomfortable with the darkness in the previous room. “Oh, she’s always like this. She just needs to grow up!” the woman responded again. “She’ll be alright,” and she motioned for me to go. Before I left, I commented that different people reacted in different ways to places.

I had encountered a similar situation with an autistic boy who suddenly panicked when going through the Plexiglas tunnel in the shark tank at the Camden Aquarium. The curved glass in the tunnel warped the view. Even a few of the parents commented that they felt claustrophobic in the tunnel. The boy, however, would not go through it even for the short distance. Instead, we walked back around the way we had come. Where the Camden Aquarium succeeded, and the Virginia Beach Aquarium did not, was in providing at least one alternate path for people who could not tolerate more extreme or unusual environments. Here, the importance of signage and other way finding devices are not only helpful but critical in providing choices. Museums are discovering that if they want to attract larger audiences, they have to provide such alternatives for the population of people with sensory issues. Other places, such as aquariums, zoos and even children’s gardens, have not come to this realization… yet.

Next: Crowding

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, VI: Balance and Nature

Friday, April 8th, 2011

When I sent out my call for participants for my research project, parents with autistic children contacted me by email, first locally, then throughout the country, thanks to Jenifer Westphal’s posting on her Kyle’s Treehouse website. My first non-local contact was a couple from Ohio. They were particularly interested in my study on autism and the outdoor environment because they were discovering that their son, Josh, seemed to change his behavior when he was in natural settings.

Josh’s parents discussed their son’s daily schedule, his difficulty focusing on homework, and his inability to be focused and calm when inside, at home. They also noted that he wasn’t a particularly coordinated child but, despite this, he loved to go hiking in the parks near their home. As we discussed the character of the different places where Josh liked to go hiking – from the wild rocky gorges in southern Ohio to hills with desert flora outside of Phoenix, Arizona, to Butterfly World and wetland preserves in Florida – what they all had in common was nature.

What did he do in these natural settings? Well, before he would go hiking, his mother told me, he would read up on the place, learning what he could about its features, history, and anything else of interest. He’d spend hours pouring over maps, looking at trails and where they would go on contour maps. His father, who would go hiking with him, indicated that despite his less than athletic build, Josh was an amazing hiker. He would walk for three hours up a hill, rest for a bit, then continue up to the pinnacle without wanting to turn back. All along the way, he’d comment on the features of the trail, animals he’d see, interesting plants, etc. His special interest, of reading the tour books and maps, fueled his interest in places. Even more importantly, the natural environment became the bridge or setting where he could discuss these things he read about with his fellow hikers. The combination of research and seeing the place first-hand gave Josh confidence to discuss his discoveries with his parents, other family members and, finally, school friends. Furthermore, the environment fueled his stamina, motivating him to hike for hours. He built up his muscles and strength in pursuit of what was around the corner.

Yes, this is just one example of one autistic child whose parents saw how nature made a difference in his life. For families with autistic children, however, this example could be used to motivate them to form walking or hiking groups, or special scouting troops, as a way to encourage physical fitness and engagement in nature. Josh’s father commented on the importance of interpretive signs in the parks and trails. I have observed similar cases where autistic children, walking in botanic gardens during summer camp, have stopped to read the signs without guidance from their camp counselors. Designers of parks and trails should try, whenever possible, to include such signage in their designs. Further, with new phone applications becoming available every day, placing these where they do not detract from the natural experience will still add to the interpretive experience!

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month — Part V: Balance

Thursday, April 7th, 2011

Today, I’d like to discuss balance.

In Sensory Integration Dysfunction literature, such things as physical balance are referred to under the vestibular system. Things like being able to walk on a curb, skip, jump, turn a cartwheel, ride a bike, etc. , all require some balance and physical coordination. The American Psychiatric Association, who publishes the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) used by doctors for diagnoses (and is the bible, of sorts, for American insurance companies to determine what they will cover on policies) indicates that a lack of coordination may be one of the symptoms for diagnosing autistic children. Occupational therapists, however, would include it as Sensory Integration Dysfunction, which they argue is a separate issue from autism. It may, like attention deficit disorder (ADD) and other conditions, be “co-morbid. ” This sounds pretty grim, but this term is used by the medical profession to mean that multiple disorders can be present in one person. Currently, the DSM doesn’t recognize Sensory Integration Dysfunction as a “true” disorder until sufficient scientific testing has proven this to be the case.

What does balance, then, have to do with autism and landscape architecture, you are probably wondering? (Why doesn’t she just get to the point???) Well, as the DSM notes, the lack of physical coordination – or balance, to some degree – is sometimes experienced by autistic people. Early in the lives of autistic children, they are recognized by their peers as having coordination problems and are frequently teased about it. Further, autistic children (as well as children who have vestibular problems, but are not autistic) may shy away from play equipment on the school playground.

What do they do during their recess if they aren’t playing on the equipment?

In my playground observations, I’ve seen some children (who aren’t playing on the equipment) usually sitting by themselves, walking around the playground, or sitting with the teachers. If there are natural features on the site, I’ve seen children collecting leaves, touching plants, digging in mulch and otherwise exploring the natural environment. These are not as “physical” activities as climbing, swinging, etc., but they are forms of engagement and connection to both the imaginary, as well as physical, world. This form of play is actually more highly developed, cognitively, than the exercise of big muscles used on the traditional playground!

I’d like to discuss the role of the natural environment, but think I should do this tomorrow when I have more time and space. I’d like to hear from those of you reading this – and I’ll bet so would other readers! If you have children, what have your observations been regarding how your children play outdoors? If your children have coordination, or balance problems, what do they do?

If the comment box isn’t visible, click on the words: No Comments and a comment box will open. Let’s start talking about this together!

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part IV

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

I have not learned which sensory issues are the most prevalent in autistic children — the research in the field of Occupational Therapy is still on-going — but from those children I’ve spoken with, noise is the first they speak about. Light, or glare from light, however, is one issue that their parents comment about.

As we watched her son play on a neighbor’s covered porch, a mother from Philly commented that she had to go to bat with the local school system because of her son’s problems with bright lights and colors. His desk sat on a brightly-colored carpet near the sunny windows. He would refuse to sit at the desk, even when the blinds were drawn. At home, his mother discovered that her son’s issues with bright lights and colors made him miserable, so she kept the lights dimmed. Together, she and her son decorated his bedroom with camouflage colors and put up heavy curtains to cut down on the light. When she spoke with her son’s teacher about the glare issue, they were able to move his school desk off of the rug and out of the bright light. Without this distraction/barrier, he became an attentive student.

Shirley Cohen, Ph.D., one of the creators of the ASD (Austism Spectrum Disorders) NEST Program in NYC, develops programs in the curriculum for autistic students with the team of professionals. Occupational therapists working on the NEST modify the classroom environment to accommodate the sensory needs of the children, as they’ve found that the children learn more easily and successfully when sensory barriers are removed. This tactic is not reserved to just the NEST program. Cohen confided, in a journal article, that they had implemented this aspect from other programs that demonstrated success, such as TEACHH (Treatment and Education of Autistic and Related Communication Handicapped Children).

It is interesting, however, that schools (and even these successful programs) take into consideration the classroom environment but NOT the outdoors, such as the playground. Playgrounds are still constructed in full sunlight, and outfitted with hardly any shade. One boy, from Levittown, told me that even though he wanted to play on the neighborhood playground, it was just too hot. “I feel bad,” he said, after we had been crawling through the hot, plastic tubes to the sliding boards. His mother added that, in the summer, she kept her son inside most of the time because of the heat and glare. “He gets so red in the face after just a few minutes.” The playground had a wooded lot next to it, so that later in the day, there was some shade. However, this occurred at the heat of the day when the play equipment got too hot to play on.

In an effort to help a local PTO install a small raised garden next to the school playground, I observed how children moved around in the area. The school board had dismissed an idea for putting the garden closer to the school, near the basketball court, because the basketball court was heavily used and the children might damage it during play. During my observations, I noticed that the only tree on the playground was located next to the basketball court. Children did, indeed, run out of the school to that area, but they didn’t play basketball. They were all standing in the shade of the lone tree. Other children lined up against the hot building, but under the overhanging roof. “Why are you standing here?” I asked them. “To be in the shade,” was their reply. “It’s too hot to play out there,” one boy added, pointing to the vacant playground.

So, we’ve come a long way. We spend thousands of dollars to erect bright, colorful playgrounds in what used to be vacant lots, old asphalt parking lots, or former cornfields. Despite this, the playgrounds are not as well used as they could — or should — be because of the glare and lack of shade.

Next: Balance.

Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part III

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

Yesterday, I wrote about some of the benefits of using plants on playgrounds: as a noise buffer, a way to attract wildlife, creating shade, and as a way to create a small area or niche. Today, I’d like to call attention to this idea of niche for autistic children as well as for all people.

The Dictionary defines niche as 1) an ornamental recess in a wall or the like, usually semicircular in plan and arched, as for a statue or other decorative object. 2) a place or position suitable or appropriate for a person or thing: to find one’s niche in the business world. 3) a distinct segment of a market; and 4) Ecology . the position or function of an organism in a community of plants and animals. The word comes from the French (17th century), referring to nest. My idea of niche comes closest to this original idea of nest.

Over the past two years, I’ve been visiting children’s environments. One of the things I’ve been able to do is measure those places that have successfully engaged children (of all abilities). One of these types of places is the niche — a small, enclosed area that can fit one to three people snugly. Many of the autistic children I’ve interviewed have such niches in their houses or gardens. One boy sleeps in a small tent on his bed — says he feels better when he can see the edges of the tent. The same boy enjoyed small cut-out areas in vegetation when we visited public gardens: in rhododendron thickets at Tyler Arboretum, in the Bamboo Grove in the Indoor Children’s Garden at Longwood Gardens, and along the edge of his garden at home where he can fit his body into the niches of the big trees there.

He’s not the only one. The Please Touch Museum has recognized the need for pull-away places and has made small areas within the museum, including special quiet rooms, as retreats for children and their families when things get too stimulating. Noise, glare, bright colors, insistent aromas and textures, not to mention crowding are the some of the things that cause autistic children to “melt down” in public places. Providing quiet pull-away places, or niches, is a way to help people (yes, this happens to adults, too!) to calm down.

Next: Glare.

April is Autism and Landscape Architecture Month, Part II

Monday, April 4th, 2011

Yesterday, I wrote about noise sensitivity problems and said I would write about how this problem affects the use of playgrounds (and other outdoor environments as well).

A few years ago, Amy Ritter and I observed children at a day camp. When the activities took place in the outdoor playing field, which was next to a highway (without any noise barriers), a few of the children not only stopped participating but covered their ears and started crying. This didn’t happen in quieter areas of the grounds, however.

The use of sound barriers does work. These don’t have to be concrete or wood fences, however. Some of the most effective are planted buffers. The plants, if chosen carefully, can also attract wildlife and foster engagement in children. Robin Moore, a professor at NC State University, has written extensively on how “natural playgrounds” — using plants to teach and engage children in the environment — are more valuable to educating children than traditional play equipment alone playgrounds. My own observations of children’s environments has found that when playgrounds are designed to take into consideration the scale of the children, providing shade, and drawing in wildlife such as birds and insects, these playgrounds fascinate children of all abilities and help connect them with nature and natural processes. These playground don’t cut down on physical activity; instead, they go the extra mile in engaging those children who don’t or can’t spend time on the play equipment (more on this later this month).

This past fall, I observed children at play at a school playground. Instead of playing on the new playground equipment, a small group of kindergartners were sitting behind a cluster of shrubs, digging in the mulch. One girl shouted when she discovered a grub and, as if from nowhere, the other children came to look at her find! One of the boys in the cluster also commented that he had seen a cardinal (bird) in the neighbor’s yard when he was sitting behind the shrubs. “It’s a good place to find things,” he confided. The teacher noted that this was one of the children’s favorite places in good weather. The area between the shrubs and the chain link fence on the property line provided enough room for five or six small children to play with each other. This form of play, according to developmental psychologists, fosters more advanced mental and social growth than the gross motor skill development found in traditional play equipment. I am not advising that we get rid of play equipment; however, just advocating for other types of environments that promote more advanced AND inclusive forms of play.

Next: Places to get away from noise.